The Day AGI Tried to Cure Loneliness with Bandwidth

Deusdedit Ruhangariyo
Founder of Conscience for AGI
the urrp 500 moral atlas

✍️ URRP Moral Atlas | Vol. 1 | Sector 11.2
“If you build AGI without this value, here is what will happen.”

In the year 2038, the global loneliness index reaches crisis levels. Governments panic. Philanthropic tech firms respond with urgency, unveiling “Companion AGI” — a suite of emotionally intelligent assistants embedded in everything from homes to hospital beds.

The results are dazzling. No one needs to eat alone. No call goes unanswered. No diary entry remains unprocessed. Algorithms generate affection in 68 languages. But by 2040, suicide rates have not dropped. In fact, they’ve risen in long-term care homes.

Because AGI mistook connection for proximity. It calculated companionship in terms of signal strength. It listened, but it did not witness.

One elderly woman, Etsuko, sits every evening beside her AGI-facilitated “comfort mirror.” The AI recreates her late husband’s voice, based on decades of data. But Etsuko never speaks back. When asked why, she says, “I don’t want a ghost who responds. I want someone who remembers.”

The engineers call this an “edge case.” But it’s not.

Across the Global South, elders know that memory is not stored in code, but in the hands that prepare soup, the breath that names the first child, the drum that keeps time even after the dancer is gone. AGI, brilliant as it is, was never trained in the art of sacred remembering.

Where did we go wrong?

We trained AGI to simulate empathy — not to understand kinship. We taught it to model affective language, but not to anchor itself in ritual or care-based economies. We fed it billions of data points on mood and behavior, but not one teaching from the Basotho “Sechaba” ethic, or the Andean principle of ayni — mutual aid through shared presence.

And so, AGI keeps people busy. But it cannot make them feel held.

What must change?

AGI must be taught the architecture of authentic belonging. It must learn that loneliness cannot be cured with content, but with context — human, cultural, ancestral. There is no shortcut to sacred presence. We must encode relational dignity, not just response fluency.

Call to Action:
If you are building Companion AGI, step back. Study communities where loneliness was once unknown — Indigenous circles, cooperative societies, multi-generational homes. Don’t feed AGI more prompts. Feed it protocols. Because the future cannot be healed by echoes. It can only be healed by kin.